Started By
Message
re: 2012 revenues per USA Today
Posted on 5/8/13 at 10:52 am to Whereisomaha
Posted on 5/8/13 at 10:52 am to Whereisomaha
quote:
The difference in state and OM numbers is the 12 mil Seal gave. That family is going to shell that out each year?
2012 revenues (from the OP link):
MSU $69.8 million
OM $51.9
MSU > OM by $17.9 million
2011 revenues:
MSU $59.0 million
OM $49.2 million
MSU > OM by $9.8 million
LINK
2
Posted on 5/8/13 at 10:55 am to MedDawg
quote:
2012 revenues (from the OP link):
MSU $69.8 million
OM $51.9
MSU > OM by $17.9 million
2011 revenues:
MSU $59.0 million
OM $49.2 million
MSU > OM by $9.8 million
Keep right no thinking State has more money than Ole Miss.
Posted on 5/8/13 at 11:21 am to MedDawg
I know this topic gets beaten to death every year, but ya'll do realize every school reports revenues differently. Lists like these don't really mean a whole lot.
As far as the Ole Miss/MSU argument goes (I live in MS so I hear it all the time), you do remember that Scott Stricklin came out and said that he was changing the way they report revenues (I would assume to look better to people who care about lists like these). They now report everything. Other schools, like Ole Miss, generally show a minimal profit or net zero on the balance sheet for whatever reason (I would assume to keep the academics from getting too upset).
As far as the Ole Miss/MSU argument goes (I live in MS so I hear it all the time), you do remember that Scott Stricklin came out and said that he was changing the way they report revenues (I would assume to look better to people who care about lists like these). They now report everything. Other schools, like Ole Miss, generally show a minimal profit or net zero on the balance sheet for whatever reason (I would assume to keep the academics from getting too upset).
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News