Started By
Message

re: Saban Publicly Supports 9 Game Schedule

Posted on 5/2/13 at 6:21 pm to
Posted by GumBro Jackson
Raleigh
Member since Mar 2011
3115 posts
Posted on 5/2/13 at 6:21 pm to
quote:

This is probably the best solution. Let Bama/UT, UGA/barn, and Mizzou/Arky (if they want to) keep their yearly games, and let everyone else drop theirs. The B1G will only have one cross-divisional game (IN/PU).


I'd be good with that. I think the rivalry games need to be protected, but if others don't want cross-division rivals, that is fine. Auburn will continue playing Georgia every year and LSU can rotate if it doesn't have the sack to play Florida.
Posted by molsusports
Member since Jul 2004
36136 posts
Posted on 5/2/13 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

This is probably the best solution. Let Bama/UT, UGA/barn, and Mizzou/Arky (if they want to) keep their yearly games, and let everyone else drop theirs. The B1G will only have one cross-divisional game (IN/PU).



I guess it could come to pass but it is a lousy solution IMO. Because it reduces those four major programs (UGA, UT, Bama, Auburn) to only playing the other opposite division opponents a couple times every 14 years

The big ten doing that goofy solution will have virtually no competitive impact on their league because both Purdue and Indiana are irrelevant
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter