Started By
Message

re: bama lost alot on both sides of the ball

Posted on 4/29/13 at 5:39 pm to
Posted by sarc
Member since Mar 2011
9997 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 5:39 pm to
You can choose whatever parameters you want. I chose common opponents because that's a commonly used metric. Common opponents plus head to head? Not so much

Also, not sure why you keep trying to compare top 3 WRs or compare a certain subset of LSUs WRs versus a certain subset of Bama's WRs other than to artificially create a comparison that is beneficial to LSU. We're comparing returning units and Coop, Bell, Norwood, Jones, and White are all returning WRs that will play a lot for Bama regardless of how few LSU chooses to use in its rotation.
Posted by UAFanFromNOLA
NOLA
Member since Dec 2011
4882 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 5:46 pm to
Alabama fans, why are you letting the guy with the broken caps lock key troll you?
Posted by 167back
Dos Gris
Member since Jun 2012
4714 posts
Posted on 4/29/13 at 10:21 pm to
Hey sac I tell you what you can throw all of white's EIGHT receptions into the bama toatal if you like. Then compare LSU's four receivers to all five of bama's receivers that are returning. You know the five that actually played last year. Not another carter that was preseason All SEC without ever having played a down for the tide.

If you think what we did head to head doesn't matter then so be it. I would think that is more important than common opponent. When you put the head to head in there then we are just comparing the two teams to the rest of the WEST. What's wrong with that???

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter