Started By
Message
re: Is this the Weakest SEC Basketball has Ever Been?
Posted on 3/11/13 at 10:34 pm to BigBird09
Posted on 3/11/13 at 10:34 pm to BigBird09
quote:
le, and Taylor to rid us of our post depth problem.
Arkansas- Returns everyone, and adds two very solid posts to the mix, Portis and Kingsley
LSU- Returns pretty much everyone but the Tuba, and adds an exceptional class.
Tier 3:
Mizzou- Loses Bell, Bowers, and Oriakhi, all huge hits, but returns everyone else and adds a pretty solid class.
Don't know much about everyone else, but those should be the top teams. I'm sure some Mizzou fans will jump all over me, but you can't just replace Oriakhi and Bowers with not 1 single player who averaged more than 10 minutes down low.
My guess is Mizzou is playing in the tourney while 4 or so of those teams you list ahead of us watch.
Posted on 3/11/13 at 10:38 pm to reedus23
I wouldn't be surprised at all if Mizzou ended up in the NIT next season. Not a flame... I just don't think that Criswell, Post, and JWIII will be able to fully replace the production of Bowers and Oriakhi down low.
Posted on 3/11/13 at 10:40 pm to reedus23
Maybe so. It's nothing personal and I don't think y'all will be a bad team at all, but a lot of SEC teams will be peaking next year, while your peak was last year and this year. Having said that coaching blunders do happen and players do have bad years and some terrific years, so it really wouldn't be a shock if you were right.
This post was edited on 3/11/13 at 10:46 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)