Started By
Message

re: Bama's "dynasty" was nearly a 10-3 team

Posted on 1/12/13 at 2:05 am to
Posted by GCTiger11
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Jan 2012
45162 posts
Posted on 1/12/13 at 2:05 am to
quote:

LSU was better than UF so 5th best team.


Meh. Both were overrated with terrible offenses. Don't know how I feel saying UF is definitely better. Their secondary was undoubtedly better than ours.

quote:

Carolina and A&M both were better than LSU at the end of the year.


At the end of year maybe, but then again, I wouldn't say they were definitely better. We beat USCe and we were both beat by Florida, although they were beat much worse.

And as for A&M, using LSU's post-Bama game sleepwalking play as a representative of their whole season play is about as legit as using A&M's first half as the indicator of their whole season.


quote:

LSU has a lot of good players on offense, but they need a star or two.


Landry, Ware, and Ford were all 5 stars. Guess they really never lived up to their potential. They all had flashes, but none of them seemed to bring it every game.
Posted by BhamDore
Nashville
Member since Aug 2009
6294 posts
Posted on 1/12/13 at 2:19 am to
Landry and Hill cold both be legit with a real OC. The game plan used against Bama should be the prototype going forward. Les Miles and stud also need to do a better job with the O line in pass pro.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter