Started By
Message
re: Bama's "dynasty" was nearly a 10-3 team
Posted on 1/12/13 at 2:05 am to BhamDore
Posted on 1/12/13 at 2:05 am to BhamDore
quote:
LSU was better than UF so 5th best team.
Meh. Both were overrated with terrible offenses. Don't know how I feel saying UF is definitely better. Their secondary was undoubtedly better than ours.
quote:
Carolina and A&M both were better than LSU at the end of the year.
At the end of year maybe, but then again, I wouldn't say they were definitely better. We beat USCe and we were both beat by Florida, although they were beat much worse.
And as for A&M, using LSU's post-Bama game sleepwalking play as a representative of their whole season play is about as legit as using A&M's first half as the indicator of their whole season.
quote:
LSU has a lot of good players on offense, but they need a star or two.
Landry, Ware, and Ford were all 5 stars. Guess they really never lived up to their potential. They all had flashes, but none of them seemed to bring it every game.
Posted on 1/12/13 at 2:19 am to GCTiger11
Landry and Hill cold both be legit with a real OC. The game plan used against Bama should be the prototype going forward. Les Miles and stud also need to do a better job with the O line in pass pro.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News