Started By
Message

re: Bama's "dynasty" was nearly a 10-3 team

Posted on 1/12/13 at 1:59 am to
Posted by BhamDore
Nashville
Member since Aug 2009
6294 posts
Posted on 1/12/13 at 1:59 am to
LSU was better than UF so 5th best team. Carolina and A&M both were better than LSU at the end of the year.

LSU has a lot of good players on offense, but they need a star or two.
Posted by GCTiger11
Ocean Springs, MS
Member since Jan 2012
45162 posts
Posted on 1/12/13 at 2:05 am to
quote:

LSU was better than UF so 5th best team.


Meh. Both were overrated with terrible offenses. Don't know how I feel saying UF is definitely better. Their secondary was undoubtedly better than ours.

quote:

Carolina and A&M both were better than LSU at the end of the year.


At the end of year maybe, but then again, I wouldn't say they were definitely better. We beat USCe and we were both beat by Florida, although they were beat much worse.

And as for A&M, using LSU's post-Bama game sleepwalking play as a representative of their whole season play is about as legit as using A&M's first half as the indicator of their whole season.


quote:

LSU has a lot of good players on offense, but they need a star or two.


Landry, Ware, and Ford were all 5 stars. Guess they really never lived up to their potential. They all had flashes, but none of them seemed to bring it every game.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter