Started By
Message
re: Bama's "dynasty" was nearly a 10-3 team
Posted on 1/12/13 at 1:59 am to GCTiger11
Posted on 1/12/13 at 1:59 am to GCTiger11
LSU was better than UF so 5th best team. Carolina and A&M both were better than LSU at the end of the year.
LSU has a lot of good players on offense, but they need a star or two.
LSU has a lot of good players on offense, but they need a star or two.
Posted on 1/12/13 at 2:05 am to BhamDore
quote:
LSU was better than UF so 5th best team.
Meh. Both were overrated with terrible offenses. Don't know how I feel saying UF is definitely better. Their secondary was undoubtedly better than ours.
quote:
Carolina and A&M both were better than LSU at the end of the year.
At the end of year maybe, but then again, I wouldn't say they were definitely better. We beat USCe and we were both beat by Florida, although they were beat much worse.
And as for A&M, using LSU's post-Bama game sleepwalking play as a representative of their whole season play is about as legit as using A&M's first half as the indicator of their whole season.
quote:
LSU has a lot of good players on offense, but they need a star or two.
Landry, Ware, and Ford were all 5 stars. Guess they really never lived up to their potential. They all had flashes, but none of them seemed to bring it every game.
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News