Started By
Message
re: Rewatched the Florida/ATM game tonight.
Posted on 12/26/12 at 10:40 pm to gatordmb89
Posted on 12/26/12 at 10:40 pm to gatordmb89
quote:
We ran zone with our LB's. Corners matched up in man/cover 4 look.
Exactly. The receivers weren't confident enough or used to Manziel, as he'd only been with the 1's for 2 weeks.
I'm not saying we would have won. Florida played a great game. However, to say that the September 8th Manziel is going to be what every team can expect is equally absurd.
2
Posted on 12/26/12 at 10:42 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
I wouldn't read into the result too much. Y'all won, congrats and such. And I agree with Lobotomy in that I don't guarantee that we would win had we played later...but you can't say that it wouldn't be a much different game.
Posted on 12/26/12 at 10:44 pm to CGSC Lobotomy
I think Manziel was playing better late in the year, but so was UF's defense. Every team/individual grows throughout the year. One of Florida's biggest issues this year was playing up and down to competition. I just think UF's D matches up really well with ATM's O, same with LSU's D. Lots of speed and athleticism in the front 7 and corners that are good enough to man up. Only 2 teams that could hang with ATM because of the adjustments they made with their front 7.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News