Started By
Message

re: No suspension for Dial

Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:14 am to
Posted by davesdawgs
Georgia - Class of '75
Member since Oct 2008
20307 posts
Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:14 am to
The issue never was could Murray be blocked/hit on that play; it was whether the hit was helmet to helmet. My assessment: Dial led with his shoulder but their helmets definitely collided. It would have never happened if Murray had stayed in the pocket. When a QB wanders out of the pocket following an INT then he is fair game.
Posted by DvlsAdvocat
Your Mom's House, AL
Member since Jul 2007
24491 posts
Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:16 am to
quote:

My assessment: Dial led with his shoulder but their helmets definitely collided.


Which happens on 90% of all tackles...

Helmets making contact is not illegal. Its how the hit was initiated that the rules were designed for.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42582 posts
Posted on 12/14/12 at 9:16 am to
quote:

The issue never was could Murray be blocked/hit on that play; it was whether the hit was helmet to helmet. My assessment: Dial led with his shoulder but their helmets definitely collided. It would have never happened if Murray had stayed in the pocket. When a QB wanders out of the pocket following an INT then he is fair game.


That can be debated, but it happens so fast, it's a hard call for the offical. The 100# difference in their weight made the block look violent.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter