Started By
Message

re: Post Grades for the SEC Hires

Posted on 12/7/12 at 2:26 pm to
Posted by BC22
Empire, AL
Member since Nov 2012
207 posts
Posted on 12/7/12 at 2:26 pm to
You hired a ACC DC with as much talent as LSU or Bama. Should have went with Dykes or Kingsbury

quote:

I think we made a better hire than you guys did.


Posted by Heresaucer
Member since Oct 2012
2241 posts
Posted on 12/7/12 at 2:29 pm to
quote:

Kingsbury


I think he would have been a big mistake, he is young and definitely would be in over his head running a program in the SEC. Especially one with the disadvantages UK has.

I think Stoops was a great hire, he really understands the step up in recruiting we need. Ohio is one of the few advantages we have over other SEC Schools. He is from there, and plans on recruiting it hard.
Posted by JombieZombie
Member since Nov 2009
7687 posts
Posted on 12/7/12 at 7:48 pm to
Arkansas - A-
Auburn - D
UT - B-
UK - C
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
15606 posts
Posted on 12/7/12 at 9:02 pm to
Arky - C, should be a 7-9 win team, should get better in the trenches, and be a tougher team.

Auburn - D, should be a 5-9 win team. They'll score points, and boy will teams ever score on them.

Tenn - B+, this might be the best hire of the bunch. I like this guy, he's been good at following Kelly, let's see if he can step out of his shadow.

Kentucky - Potato. I liked that answer, it pretty much describes the relevance of UK football, doesn't much matter who the coach is.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter