Started By
Message

re: Why hasn't Dial been suspended yet?

Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:48 pm to
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Tittleman's Crest
Member since Feb 2009
52859 posts
Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:48 pm to
I think its funny that I have been called names because I disagree with the people that think that it wasnt legal.

These facts are in front of me: Murray was a defender moving towards our ball carrier(who had not yet been tackled) about 7-10 yards in front of the play. He was fair game. That is a fact, and cannot be disputed. Dial lit his arse up, with incidental contact to his head, which DOES NOT MATTER since Murray was a defender at that point. It was a fair play. Please refute any of what I just posted.

This post was edited on 12/5/12 at 2:49 pm
Posted by TreyAnastasio
Bitch I'm From Cleveland
Member since Dec 2010
46759 posts
Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

which DOES NOT MATTER since Murray was a defender at that point.


Thats a good point. I have never seen an offensive player get called for a blow to the head. Either way, flag no flag, wouldnt have changed anything.
Posted by HottyToddy7
Member since Sep 2010
14034 posts
Posted on 12/5/12 at 2:51 pm to
That is launching if I have ever seen it. If that was a tackle he would be suspended for sure. To me it looks like targeting and unnecessary roughness.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter