re: Lacy's fumble on the 1.

quote:

---

Yeah I knew he got in, but just like Williams last year, even with photographical evidence good luck convincing other fan bases about this.

---

I think the deal with the Williams INT was that it was initially called an INT on the field and there wasn't conclusive evidence to overturn it. Had it been called a catch I don't think it would have been overturned either. When viewed from Williams left side it appeared he had possession of the ball when his shoulder made contact with the ground but from the right side it looked like Reid was taking the ball away as they went down. If memory serves, the official that made the call was on the right side of the play. The bigger question to me was always why did a 260 lb TE allow a 190 lb DB to take the football away from him?