Started By
Message
re: I just rewatched the UF game again, let's discuss this turnover issue
Posted on 11/30/12 at 12:22 pm to WG_Dawg
Posted on 11/30/12 at 12:22 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
WTF are you talking about? Which game?
If you would have actually read the OP, all I was doing was refuting that this game means any less or was cheapened by UF's turnovers, since in reality those turnovers were caused by our defense.
who said that?
Oh, I can read. You just can't remember what you and the Georgia contingent were saying all last year and all off season about the South Carolina game.
At least be consistent. Bashing Carolina for creating turnovers and then posting this pile,
1
Posted on 11/30/12 at 12:33 pm to therick711
quote:
You just can't remember what you and the Georgia contingent were saying all last year and all off season about the South Carolina game.
No, apparently you can't. All we were saying was that, contrary to popular belief, our defense didn't give up 45 points. People pointed to our poor defense that game and giving up 6 touchdowns, when many of those points were off of offense and special teams. NOBODY was saying it discounted USC's win or the game meant any less or they shouldn't count.
People talk about this year's UF game as if it shouldn't mean as much. One tool earlier this week even said something along the lines of "turnovers aren't part of the game"
quote:
Bashing Carolina for creating turnovers and then posting this pile,
Who bashed SC?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News