Started By
Message
re: Sample East/West Realignment after 2013 season?
Posted on 11/13/12 at 1:51 pm to MaroonWhite
Posted on 11/13/12 at 1:51 pm to MaroonWhite
The AD's at the last meeting seemed to be adamant about keeping those rivalries intact which this format would allow. There is no set solution on how the 2014 season will be played.
The SEC Plays sports other than football.
Geographically, it makes sense.
College football teams have up and down years.
The SEC Plays sports other than football.
Geographically, it makes sense.
College football teams have up and down years.
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 1:59 pm to Chd1478
quote:Football takes top priority b/c of the revenue it brings to the conference. So yes technically there are other sports but none match the importance placed on football.
The SEC Plays sports other than football.
quote:Yep.
Geographically, it makes sense.
quote:Yeah but not all go up and down evenly. AU is up more than down. MSU is down more than up.. etc. etc. To put LSU, aTm, and Arky in a three man race while AU, Bama, UGA, UT, and UF have to fight it out in the East is bullshite. Add SC to the East too under Spurrier and you have hell compared to Heaven in the west.
College football teams have up and down years.
This post was edited on 11/13/12 at 2:03 pm
Posted on 11/13/12 at 1:59 pm to Chd1478
quote:
College football teams have up and down years
True, and if you look at the 7 and 7 split in the OP, the overwhelming majority of SEC history would belong to the east. With a few exceptions, Bama, UGA, AU, UT, UF will always be good/pretty good teams, and sometimes great, elite teams.
MSU, Ole miss, missouri, arkansas, vandy have historically been mediocre/bad/awful teams with a few blips of success.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News