Started By
Message
re: Coaching Candidate Discussion thread
Posted on 11/5/12 at 6:02 am to BluegrassBelle
Posted on 11/5/12 at 6:02 am to BluegrassBelle
I've said it many times already, but once more. Dykes will take us back to Mumme days, so if that is what Mitch wants, fine with me.
However, the wins and losses won't change significantly, but if the goal is to draw the fans back to watch us lose to Louisville 52-45 then so be it. That might be all that matters.
I want to compete better in the SEC, so give me a defensive head coach to start with. It might not appeal to the fan base who have been bored to death by Jokerball (myself included), but a slow and steady improvement will benefit us more in the long run in my opinion.
However, the wins and losses won't change significantly, but if the goal is to draw the fans back to watch us lose to Louisville 52-45 then so be it. That might be all that matters.
I want to compete better in the SEC, so give me a defensive head coach to start with. It might not appeal to the fan base who have been bored to death by Jokerball (myself included), but a slow and steady improvement will benefit us more in the long run in my opinion.
1
Posted on 11/5/12 at 7:08 am to kywildcatfanone
quote:
Mumme days,
quote:
but if the goal is to draw the fans back to watch us lose to Louisville 52-45
Mumme went 2-2 vs Louisville and his first win was a 68-34 win over them. A coach with a gimmicky offense will work for a little bit, and once the SEC defenses catch on, it's over. I think your average fan would take a 73-66 loss over what we've had the last 3 years.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News