Started By
Message
re: Texas A&M = 3rd best in the SEC
Posted on 11/3/12 at 7:14 pm to GalvoAg
Posted on 11/3/12 at 7:14 pm to GalvoAg
Notorious, not sure what it's supposed to mean but love the GIF.
Any other Ags gettin' tired of some Ags starting threads almost begging for pats on the back lol? Let your work on the field speak for itself...if you're bad@ss, others will be the ones pimping your achievements!
Any other Ags gettin' tired of some Ags starting threads almost begging for pats on the back lol? Let your work on the field speak for itself...if you're bad@ss, others will be the ones pimping your achievements!
Posted on 11/3/12 at 7:28 pm to Barnacle
Probably 4th. I think we beat Florida if we play again. :moralvictory:
Posted on 11/3/12 at 7:33 pm to Barnacle
quote:
Any other Ags gettin' tired of some Ags starting threads almost begging for pats on the back lol? Let your work on the field speak for itself...if you're bad@ss, others will be the ones pimping your achievements!
Posted on 11/3/12 at 7:38 pm to Barnacle
Record says we're 5th or 6th. With Lattimore out and the way our offense is humming, I think it's more likely that we're 5th ahead of SCar (sucks about Lattimore, but that's football).
My totally biased opinion is that we're 4th behind LSU, Bama, and Georgia. Florida got us in our first game of the season (but they'd already had a tune up game), with new coaches, in new schemes on both sides of the ball (3-4 to 4-3, west coast to air raid), and with a fish qb making his first collegiate start. We had no downfield passing ability and couldn't run the ball. And with all those advantages it was still a 3 point game.
So yea, they beat us fair and square on day 1, but our offense is much, much better than it was then. Unless they got a lot of TOs, we'd score at least 27-30 and I don't see Muschamp's limpdeek offense getting close to that.
My totally biased opinion is that we're 4th behind LSU, Bama, and Georgia. Florida got us in our first game of the season (but they'd already had a tune up game), with new coaches, in new schemes on both sides of the ball (3-4 to 4-3, west coast to air raid), and with a fish qb making his first collegiate start. We had no downfield passing ability and couldn't run the ball. And with all those advantages it was still a 3 point game.
So yea, they beat us fair and square on day 1, but our offense is much, much better than it was then. Unless they got a lot of TOs, we'd score at least 27-30 and I don't see Muschamp's limpdeek offense getting close to that.
This post was edited on 11/3/12 at 7:39 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News