Started By
Message
re: Vegas oddsmakers say UA would be 24pt underdog to KC Chiefs, per Dan Patrick.
Posted on 10/31/12 at 1:18 pm to WG_Dawg
Posted on 10/31/12 at 1:18 pm to WG_Dawg
quote:
Why must there be the worst NFL team/best college team discussion every year?
Because the guys on the college team would be in the NFL if they didn't have to stay three years in college. The college guys aren't scrubs. It's NFL talent vs. NFL talent. It's just that one of the teams is all NFL talent and the other is merely a substantial majority.
More succinctly, I believe this discussion happens every year because I actually believe there've been years where the college team would have won.
Posted on 10/31/12 at 1:28 pm to bobbyray21
quote:
Because the guys on the college team would be in the NFL if they didn't have to stay three years in college. The college guys aren't scrubs. It's NFL talent vs.
Two things:
1)A future NFL star as a freshman or sophomore in college isn't near as good as he is when he hits his potential. Was Tom Brady as good in 1998 as he was in 2008? Just because they go on to be great doesn't mean they're always good all the time.
2)Bama (using this example from the OP) this year has plenty of NFL talent. But not every player on the team will play in the NFL. Not all will get drafted, and not all that drafted will make an impact. Some might not get higher than 2nd string, some might not make a practice squad. Then you're gonna put that up against a team full of 22 NFL starters, who were good enough to beat out other NFL caliber athletes to start for their team.
In one or two particular instances like maaaayybeeee one of bama's OL 1v1 against a KC DL, the bama player could get the better of him and win the day. But across the board, 22 on 22, it's just simply absurd to think a college team could stay close with a bunch of grown arse NFL pros.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News