Started By
Message
Champions Bowl
Posted on 10/25/12 at 4:24 pm
Posted on 10/25/12 at 4:24 pm
LINK
So this is turning out to be a little different then I thought when first announced.
Apparently "champions bowl" was just a hold over name. It will be named Sugar Bowl if in New Orleans or Cotton Bowl if in Dallas.
The Cotton Bowl should have been considered a BCS bowl all along. Our win over Arkansas should really be considered a BCS win.
Does anyone else think this quasi playoff set up that has a 12 year commitment is going to be just as big of a joke as the current set up?
So this is turning out to be a little different then I thought when first announced.
Apparently "champions bowl" was just a hold over name. It will be named Sugar Bowl if in New Orleans or Cotton Bowl if in Dallas.
The Cotton Bowl should have been considered a BCS bowl all along. Our win over Arkansas should really be considered a BCS win.
Does anyone else think this quasi playoff set up that has a 12 year commitment is going to be just as big of a joke as the current set up?
1
Posted on 10/25/12 at 4:26 pm to mograyback
quote:
Does anyone else think this quasi playoff set up that has a 12 year commitment is going to be just as big of a joke as the current set up?
Been a little out of the loop on selection since the beginning of this season. Are they still talking about having a selection committee and requiring no more than two teams from each conference?
If so, big joke.
Posted on 10/25/12 at 4:29 pm to Mizzeaux
I don't really know.. I think they're trying to not put a cap on number of teams from conferences.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News