Started By
Message
re: Injures for LSU and comparison to Bama
Posted on 10/24/12 at 4:57 pm to lsusteve1
Posted on 10/24/12 at 4:57 pm to lsusteve1
"IMO, this current lineup is the best O-Line LSU has put on the field (Faulk would make it better)."
Agree. I think a few of these injuries were unexpected gifts. Vadal is an upgrade in the run game and is gonna be tough in the next couple years. The Oline looked magnitudes better against SCar than the Gators.
*Obviously, Faulk was a big loss.
Agree. I think a few of these injuries were unexpected gifts. Vadal is an upgrade in the run game and is gonna be tough in the next couple years. The Oline looked magnitudes better against SCar than the Gators.
*Obviously, Faulk was a big loss.
1
Posted on 10/24/12 at 5:04 pm to SoFla Tideroller
I enjoy some LSU fans and Bama fans when they think injuries or suspensions or losses made their team better.
Let me be unequivocal: a healthy Faulk, Hurst, Williford, and Lonergan are demonstrably better than Dworaczyk, Turner, Porter, and Alexander.
A banged up Hurst with family life problems did struggle. When he's right, he's a monster and he has the record to prove it.
Let me be unequivocal: a healthy Faulk, Hurst, Williford, and Lonergan are demonstrably better than Dworaczyk, Turner, Porter, and Alexander.
A banged up Hurst with family life problems did struggle. When he's right, he's a monster and he has the record to prove it.
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News