Started By
Message

re: Texas A&M lockeroom goes crazy after beating Ole Miss

Posted on 10/10/12 at 4:25 pm to
Posted by 13-0 Branding Iron
Houston Memorial
Member since Jul 2012
310 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 4:25 pm to
quote:

U.S. News & World Report does not rank nuclear engineering and petroleum programs every year. The last time the magazine surveyed these areas, Texas A&M's nuclear engineering program was third (second public) and petroleum engineering was first.
That's from 2012, brah.

Also: Stanford is primarily a graduate institution, they have less than 5000 undergrads and almost all are on track for grad school. Texas is usually second to us in Pet E.
Posted by BennyAndTheInkJets
Middle of a layover
Member since Nov 2010
5608 posts
Posted on 10/10/12 at 4:32 pm to
I really hate that I'm still responding but screw it. Like I said I hate rankings to begin with.

Also, it seems that what you're saying about Stanford makes it to where if somebody had Stanford on a resume for Pet E and somebody else had Texas A&M, then Stanford would look better.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter