Started By
Message

re: Chances Ole Miss wins 6 games

Posted on 9/20/12 at 8:00 am to
Posted by CoonassBulldog
Member since Sep 2008
6913 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 8:00 am to
quote:

Go look back at his posting in 2008/2009 and I bet every SEC game was a prediction of a loss for Ole Miss.


I predicted Mississippi to win the West in 2009

The bias is made up in your head because you dont like to hear what I have to say- but I've had a pretty good pulse on your program
Posted by MaroonNation
StarkVegas, Mississippi, Bitch!
Member since Nov 2010
21950 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 8:03 am to
quote:

And because it's a rivalry game in Oxford and it's Freeze's first Egg Bowl, YES Mississippi State is winnable.


Just because Awbrin is our new rival doesn't mean Mullen will concede the Egg Bowl. It's on permanent display in StarkVegas for the foreseeable future


nb4bookmarked
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 8:05 am to
quote:

IMO, no Ole Miss fan should ever think we are going to beat Vandy until further notice.

Or state
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
68774 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 8:06 am to
quote:

nb4bookmarked


Damn you.
Posted by MaroonNation
StarkVegas, Mississippi, Bitch!
Member since Nov 2010
21950 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 8:10 am to
quote:

you're probably going to defeat your instate rival on their home turf easily.


Any field in MS is going to be our home field. This Is Our Grove
Posted by pivey14
In Your Head
Member since Mar 2012
15445 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 8:23 am to
Posted by Tds & Beer
TOT DAT MOFAN~DRIP DRIP~Bunty Pls
Member since Sep 2009
23860 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:10 am to
quote:

I can't comprehend how getting buttfricked by Texas means it's time for rampant optimism.



This. I fully expect Ole Miss to fall off as the season goes along. They are going to be really beat up.
Posted by Tds & Beer
TOT DAT MOFAN~DRIP DRIP~Bunty Pls
Member since Sep 2009
23860 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:13 am to
quote:

We won't be playing teams like Texas every week.


Yes you will
Posted by TheSecWEST
Proud to be in Starkville, MS
Member since Jan 2009
3326 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:14 am to
quote:

Hey! We got dominated by Texas and barely beat the University of Central Arkansas so logically that means we're going to beat all these teams that we haven't beaten in years because ZOmGz FREEZE!

Seriously, Ole Miss fans our way to wooly! Ole Miss has the worst defense in the country, and I truly mean this. Texas could have put up 80 points on the the rebs and Texas has a very average offense. I do not understand the hype. Ole Miss is going to end up beating Central Ark, Utep, and Tulane on the year. Think about that. They have zero chance in any other game this year due to the fact that every other team they play has the ability to run the ball up the middle for 6 yards a pop and there is nothing Ole Miss can do about it. There is just no depth and very young and sparse talent on the field right now. I do think Freeze can get Ole Miss back competitive but they are still at least 2 years away. This will not be the year the Rebs break the SEC winless streak.

p.s. I didn't even mention the pass defense.
Posted by Tds & Beer
TOT DAT MOFAN~DRIP DRIP~Bunty Pls
Member since Sep 2009
23860 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:16 am to
quote:

I'd say with the same meaning "What if Ole Miss can win 6" along with saying "What if MSU can win 11).

Both are far-fetched but reachable pending everything going perfectly
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:21 am to
For owning the state, you all seem very obsessed.
Posted by Tds & Beer
TOT DAT MOFAN~DRIP DRIP~Bunty Pls
Member since Sep 2009
23860 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Also, to whomever said ULM is better than Ole Miss...they are probably similar except the Rebels have better overall athletes (SEC > Sun Belt....see College Football for Dummies). As Bo Wallace goes, so goes OM (like Browning for ULM).


I didn't say that but I actually think ULM is better. Their qb is better too. Right now he is, at least.
Posted by Slippery Slope
Hail Satan
Member since Nov 2010
20346 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:24 am to
There is very little for us to talk about.
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:30 am to
quote:

back competitive but they are still at least 2 years away

Two years from what? I know you're a tard so it's not a big deal you would say this, but it seems to be that stupid norm other fans say that have no idea what they're talking about.

Next year we return every skill player and lose one OL on a very good offense. This offense isn't even close to what it can be. Our pace is slow and our timing isn't there yet we will still be a middle of the pack offense.

On defense we get DT and Brassell back. Our corners will be Sawyer and Brassell with Trae and Tony at safety. That's a secondary full of all SEC players. Our LB corps will be CJ, DT, and Keith Lewis. Once again full of all sec talent. Our DL will be made up of a bigger stronger more experienced Gross, Bennett/Martin/Woody and our DE's will be Channing and RN.

That is a nasty team with a full year in a real S&C program along with a first time full training table. I realize we have to sign RN and TC for that to happen and I believe it will happen though I realize there is always the chance that it will not happen. There's no doubt that this team will be a .500 team next year. So once again... Two years from what? .500 wins championships right?
This post was edited on 9/20/12 at 9:41 am
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:32 am to
quote:

I didn't say that but I actually think ULM is better. Their qb is better too. Right now he is, at least.

You have gone full tard
Posted by Slippery Slope
Hail Satan
Member since Nov 2010
20346 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:33 am to
Didn't Freeze say y'all have the talent and depth of a bad C-USA team?
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:36 am to
quote:

e. I do not understand the hype

The hype is that auburn is garbage and arky is bad with nothing to play for. Those two games are now possibilities, not for sure losses as thought before the season. That's the wool. No one thinks this team looks better than they thought they would talent wise. Our O looks better than guessed but our D looks far worse. Our fans are excited because our team is finally winning the games they should, playing for 60 minutes, and are evidently better coached. The wool is for the future. The 6 win possibility question came about not because we look so good, but because the west is much worse than thought
This post was edited on 9/20/12 at 9:38 am
Posted by Slippery Slope
Hail Satan
Member since Nov 2010
20346 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:40 am to
quote:

The wool is for the future.


Ahh.
Posted by Requiem For A Dawg
Guff of Mex
Member since Dec 2010
11975 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:40 am to
quote:

Ahh.


Zima.
Posted by Whereisomaha
Member since Feb 2010
17939 posts
Posted on 9/20/12 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Didn't Freeze say y'all have the talent and depth of a bad C-USA team?

Not in those words obviously but I get your point.
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 24
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 24Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter