Started By
Message

re: The SEC's 25 scholarship rule question

Posted on 7/9/12 at 10:11 am to
Posted by Al Bundy Bulldog
The Grindfather
Member since Dec 2010
35829 posts
Posted on 7/9/12 at 10:11 am to
quote:

If you could read it the Richt said "Theoretically" you could sign 34, but the 85 doesn't change. You can't really back count anymore. If you have 85 on board and lose 21, you can sign 21 not 25.


That's what I was thinking. And thus why it's do important that all of your signees be qualifiers.
Posted by 19auburn49
Alabama
Member since Apr 2011
286 posts
Posted on 7/9/12 at 10:30 am to
quote:

that's why you need to recruit qualifiers


That's what the rule change was all about. The Nutt/Tubs practice of over signing and shipping them off to JUCO is over.
Posted by engie
Member since Jan 2012
8953 posts
Posted on 7/9/12 at 11:39 am to
1) Backcounting is definitely still allowed. The language of how it is used has changed, but it's still happening.

2) It's shortsighted and incorrect to think you can only back count for 1 season. You can't just look at the past 2 classes to know your back count number. You have to keep looking back until you signed over 25, then interpolate it out to present day. It's still possible that you could sign well into the 30s.

3) There is no "rule" saying SEC schools can't surpass the 85 scholarship limit. Most of them do. This is oversigning. Taking over 25 is not oversigning. The cutting of players to get back to 85 is the major thing that is nationally frowned upon in the SEC, and is also the reason for the creation of 4 yr scholarships...
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter