Started By
Message
re: The SEC's 25 scholarship rule question
Posted on 7/9/12 at 10:07 am to Crowknowsbest
Posted on 7/9/12 at 10:07 am to Crowknowsbest
If you could have read it Richt said "Theoretically" you could sign 34, but the 85 doesn't change.
This post was edited on 7/9/12 at 10:18 am
Posted on 7/9/12 at 10:11 am to 19auburn49
quote:
If you could read it the Richt said "Theoretically" you could sign 34, but the 85 doesn't change. You can't really back count anymore. If you have 85 on board and lose 21, you can sign 21 not 25.
That's what I was thinking. And thus why it's do important that all of your signees be qualifiers.
Posted on 7/9/12 at 12:06 pm to 19auburn49
quote:
but the 85 doesn't change.
We have PLENTY of room.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)