Started By
Message

re: Mizzou Replaces Turf in High School Stadium

Posted on 6/2/12 at 3:44 am to
Posted by Mizzou Fan in Da ATX
Member since Dec 2011
4184 posts
Posted on 6/2/12 at 3:44 am to
That may well be true as it is brand spanking new and luxurious - though that court of yours is pretty ridiculous looking. But in terms of the SEC, we are the king of the hill with an arena that opened in the 2005 season in terms of modern amenities, design, technology, comfort and sight lines. Definitely better than the Reagan-era, sterile "multi-purpose building" piece of crap in Knoxville. Our old arena, the Hearnes Center, was a lot like Thompson-Boling and we were in a rush to get the hell out of it which should say a lot.
Posted by Daigeaux
Mountains of East Tennessee
Member since Jul 2005
5976 posts
Posted on 6/2/12 at 4:03 am to

You call this a dump?

LINK
Posted by volfan30
Member since Jun 2010
40965 posts
Posted on 6/2/12 at 4:11 am to
quote:

Definitely better than the Reagan-era, sterile "multi-purpose building" piece of crap in Knoxville.






Thompson Boling Arena has 32 luxury suites, Mizzou Arena has 28, Thompson Boling Arena has 22 loge boxes, Mizzou Arena has 20. Every seat in Thompson Boling is newer and padded, the center-hung scoreboard is larger, the concourse was re-furbished more recently and has more television screens.

The locker rooms and team rooms are the only advantage for Mizzou, luckily we are doing a large renovation on those areas after the 2012-13 season.

Outside of the exterior, in what way is Mizzou Arena superior?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter