Started By
Message
re: Mizzou Replaces Turf in High School Stadium
Posted on 6/2/12 at 3:44 am to OryGunDucks
Posted on 6/2/12 at 3:44 am to OryGunDucks
That may well be true as it is brand spanking new and luxurious - though that court of yours is pretty ridiculous looking. But in terms of the SEC, we are the king of the hill with an arena that opened in the 2005 season in terms of modern amenities, design, technology, comfort and sight lines. Definitely better than the Reagan-era, sterile "multi-purpose building" piece of crap in Knoxville. Our old arena, the Hearnes Center, was a lot like Thompson-Boling and we were in a rush to get the hell out of it which should say a lot.
Posted on 6/2/12 at 4:03 am to Mizzou Fan in Da ATX
Posted on 6/2/12 at 4:11 am to Mizzou Fan in Da ATX
quote:
Definitely better than the Reagan-era, sterile "multi-purpose building" piece of crap in Knoxville.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrolleyes.gif)
Thompson Boling Arena has 32 luxury suites, Mizzou Arena has 28, Thompson Boling Arena has 22 loge boxes, Mizzou Arena has 20. Every seat in Thompson Boling is newer and padded, the center-hung scoreboard is larger, the concourse was re-furbished more recently and has more television screens.
The locker rooms and team rooms are the only advantage for Mizzou, luckily we are doing a large renovation on those areas after the 2012-13 season.
Outside of the exterior, in what way is Mizzou Arena superior?
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)