Started By
Message
4
Posted on 3/25/12 at 1:28 pm to hg
quote:
I disagree with Auburn being 2 at RB. You lost your best RB Dyer and you have a bunch of question marks outside of that besides McCalebb.
I agree. AU has a lot of potential and upside, but hard to say they are #2.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 1:29 pm to hg
quote:
I disagree with Auburn being 2 at RB. You lost your best RB Dyer and you have a bunch of question marks outside of that besides McCalebb...
There's alot of hype with Mason, Blakely, and Grant. Obviously the latter two haven't even played, so I agree we can't put them #2. Let's wait to see if they live up to the hype. Personally I think Blakely will be very good
Posted on 3/25/12 at 1:33 pm to hg
quote:
I disagree with Auburn being 2 at RB. You lost your best RB Dyer and you have a bunch of question marks outside of that besides McCalebb...
I don't exactly have them at number 2...
I put 2nd place as them or Bama, don't know which yet. Although, if we had returned Dyer, we'd be #1.
Posted on 3/25/12 at 1:36 pm to hg
quote:
you have a bunch of question marks outside of that besides McCalebb...
Well, looking at the RBs thru LSU glasses, Tre Mason is going to be a beast and possibly one of the best in the conference.
Because of the bowl game. 7+ yds/carry. Very impressive.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News