Started By
Message

re: A&M fans (regarding Texas)

Posted on 2/14/12 at 11:26 am to
Posted by Govt Tide
Member since Nov 2009
9129 posts
Posted on 2/14/12 at 11:26 am to
I understand there is a research aspect to it but what other factors are considered. The University of Alabama's medical school (UAB), for example, draws research dollars on a level that dwarfs many current AAU member institution's overall research totals yet I doubt the AAU would bother giving them the time of day. The criteria for membership just seems arbitrary and discriminatory especially against public institutions in the Deep South.
This post was edited on 2/14/12 at 11:28 am
Posted by Mizzou Fan in Da ATX
Member since Dec 2011
4184 posts
Posted on 2/14/12 at 11:31 am to
Up at Mizzou we can relate to the backlash A&M is feeling from other institutions in-state. Southeast Missouri State and St.Louis University are, like, umm, totally jealous and stuff. The UMKC Kangaroos are hoppin' mad. And don't get me started on the reaction from Missouri Western State College! We are trying our best to maintain good relations with those behemoths of the college sporting landscape, but times are hard.
Posted by CGSC Lobotomy
Member since Sep 2011
80478 posts
Posted on 2/14/12 at 11:50 am to
quote:

I understand there is a research aspect to it but what other factors are considered. The University of Alabama's medical school (UAB), for example, draws research dollars on a level that dwarfs many current AAU member institution's overall research totals yet I doubt the AAU would bother giving them the time of day. The criteria for membership just seems arbitrary and discriminatory especially against public institutions in the Deep South.


That's another reason that adding A&M and Missouri helps. We, in addition to Florida and Vanderbilt, can lobby for the schools that are on the cusp (Georgia, Alabama, Auburn, Tennessee) for membership. I'm pretty sure that only the gay cows would object.
Posted by TeLeFaWx
Dallas, TX
Member since Aug 2011
29179 posts
Posted on 2/14/12 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

I understand there is a research aspect to it but what other factors are considered. The University of Alabama's medical school (UAB), for example, draws research dollars on a level that dwarfs many current AAU member institution's overall research totals yet I doubt the AAU would bother giving them the time of day. The criteria for membership just seems arbitrary and discriminatory especially against public institutions in the Deep South.


Well the AAU seems like the only thing that really would make a difference as far as atheltic conference. At the end of the day, most of us our public schools, and our graduates pay in-state tuition. That much won't really change.

I had no idea, until conference realignment what the AAU was, and I really don't care.

At the end of the day, my school is academically superior to yours. While I don't play football, and can't root on National Championships at the pace of the New York Yankees, I can take pride in the fact that my education was WAY better than yours. How does that affect you? It shouldn't. Just like I don't give two shits about a diploma I didn't receive. But I do know mine is better, and that does make me happy.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter