Started By
Message

re: S.O.S. and "Resumes" Are Complete BS

Posted on 12/7/11 at 8:07 pm to
Posted by TideWarrior
Asheville/Chapel Hill NC
Member since Sep 2009
11841 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 8:07 pm to
Yeah but what some fail to realize is OSU is claiming wins for their resume against La-Laf and Tulsa. No offense but they are not world beaters. GSU could probably beat both, but no one gives them credit because they are DI-AA. UM thought the same thing about App State.

Also they claim victories over Mizzou and Texas, both 7-5 teams. The only ranked team either beat was Mizzou beating Texas. Yes maybe their record of 7-5 is better than UF or MSU record of 6-6, but lets look at who UF and MSU played. MSU 6 losses were against every ranked SEC team in the BCS, including 4 that are currently ranked in the top 10. You think Mizzou or Texas would be be 7-5 if they had to play LSU, UA, Ark, UGA, AU, and USC. Neither team would be bowl bound IMO. UF has 5 losses against those teams.

So now those 7 wins for OSu over teams with winning records, lets not forget FBS teams like it matters, but 2 are cupcakes for a power conference(freebees) and the other 2 are no better than 6-6 MSU or UF.

Their resume is as overblown as a janitor listing his job on a resume as a sanitation engineer.
Posted by BayouBengals03
lsu14always
Member since Nov 2007
99999 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 8:28 pm to
quote:

Yeah but what some fail to realize is OSU is claiming wins for their resume against La-Laf and Tulsa. No offense but they are not world beaters. GSU could probably beat both, but no one gives them credit because they are DI-AA. UM thought the same thing about App State.

Also they claim victories over Mizzou and Texas, both 7-5 teams. The only ranked team either beat was Mizzou beating Texas. Yes maybe their record of 7-5 is better than UF or MSU record of 6-6, but lets look at who UF and MSU played. MSU 6 losses were against every ranked SEC team in the BCS, including 4 that are currently ranked in the top 10. You think Mizzou or Texas would be be 7-5 if they had to play LSU, UA, Ark, UGA, AU, and USC. Neither team would be bowl bound IMO. UF has 5 losses against those teams.

So now those 7 wins for OSu over teams with winning records, lets not forget FBS teams like it matters, but 2 are cupcakes for a power conference(freebees) and the other 2 are no better than 6-6 MSU or UF.

Their resume is as overblown as a janitor listing his job on a resume as a sanitation engineer

I won't argue much of this. You make some good points. I disagree in some places, but overall you are right.
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
83655 posts
Posted on 12/7/11 at 8:40 pm to
quote:

eah but what some fail to realize is OSU is claiming wins for their resume against La-Laf and Tulsa. No offense but they are not world beaters. GSU could probably beat both, but no one gives them credit because they are DI-AA. UM thought the same thing about App State.

Also they claim victories over Mizzou and Texas, both 7-5 teams. The only ranked team either beat was Mizzou beating Texas. Yes maybe their record of 7-5 is better than UF or MSU record of 6-6, but lets look at who UF and MSU played. MSU 6 losses were against every ranked SEC team in the BCS, including 4 that are currently ranked in the top 10. You think Mizzou or Texas would be be 7-5 if they had to play LSU, UA, Ark, UGA, AU, and USC. Neither team would be bowl bound IMO. UF has 5 losses against those teams.

So now those 7 wins for OSu over teams with winning records, lets not forget FBS teams like it matters, but 2 are cupcakes for a power conference(freebees) and the other 2 are no better than 6-6 MSU or UF.


Wow, YES.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter