Started By
Message
re: If rematches are supposedly unfair...
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:43 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:43 pm to BlackPawnMartyr
Ala lost to lsu in ala in 1 ot bama did not out play lsu they were forced to kick 2 long out of reach fg by lsu def... lsu blocked one and ala missed maybe one they should have hit trent was held to 90 yards and lsu fgs could have very well been td thats how close lsu was to the goal while in my heart I think ala is #2..they did not win the west so they did not win sec.....ok st won the big 12 champ...only lost to a good 6-6 iowa st team in 2ot at a tragic time for okst.....okst has beaten more ranked teams than ala...it would be great for the sec but okst deserves it!!!
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:46 pm to Budroar
what if Bama this year was Florida
LSU beats florida by 3 in OT at UF
*UF still considered the second best team
LSU beats floriday be 3 in OT in the SECCG
*UF still considered the second best team since they only lost to the best team (LSU and UF still considered the 2 best teams)
Should LSU and UF play a 3rd time for the BCSNCG?
LSU beats florida by 3 in OT at UF
*UF still considered the second best team
LSU beats floriday be 3 in OT in the SECCG
*UF still considered the second best team since they only lost to the best team (LSU and UF still considered the 2 best teams)
Should LSU and UF play a 3rd time for the BCSNCG?
Posted on 12/4/11 at 4:48 pm to Budroar
quote:
Budroar
If Okie St was undefeated you would be correct. I would still know deep down that Alabama was better than Okie St, and absolute thrashing of okie st in the NCG by LSu would prove it, but they would have deserved it for going undefeated. However, since Okie St lost to a terrible 6 and 6 team trying to pretend they deserve it is really saying hey im scared of playing a real team. At least if you were making a case for Stanford your motives wouldnt be so transparent.
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News