I think if it had been ruled on the field as a catch for Bama then it would have been reviewed and reversed to an incompletion. But the int ruling negated that and there wasn't a way they could overrule that and say it was a catch.

If he hadn't bobble the ball then it would have been a catch for Bama.

Reid left his guy and chased this receiver down. Just "boring" ole defensive play that people don't like to see and that doesn't win championships.

This post was edited on 11/6/11 at 12:19 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by tkane311

Mo-billionaire

Member since Oct 2009

2336 posts

Posted on 11/6/11 at 12:26 pm to Stuttgart Tiger

stuttgart, how could it have been an incompletion? The ball never hit the ground. I really can't even believe this is being argued at all. Watching it live it was hard to tell. Watching the replay, it could not be more crystal clear. He definately lost control BEFORE hitting the ground and the ball was never possessed by anyone on the ground until Reid had it firmly. Int, no doubt hence the "confirmation" of the call.

1 ...

Report Post

SEC Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board