Started By
Message

re: Eric Reid INT

Posted on 11/6/11 at 11:17 am to
Posted by tuptiger
Member since Jan 2008
4314 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 11:17 am to
quote:

If the refs call that a catch on the field, they wouldn't overturn it to an INT. That's how bang-bang that play was.


Disagree. Why was the call "confirmed"? It was clear Williams lost control of the ball before being "down", which means simultaneous possession couldn't apply. Eric Reid won the battle for the ball. It's as simple as that, and it should have been overturned if it would have been ruled a catch.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62493 posts
Posted on 11/6/11 at 11:19 am to
Right call. This year you have to possess the ball pass contact with the ground. Wouldn't have been a catch for Alabama. Therefore, the call was Confirmed.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter