Started By
Message
re: Looks like Auburn and Alabama will both be moved to the East
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:12 pm to parkjas2001
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:12 pm to parkjas2001
quote:
North - USCe, UT, UK, Vandy, Bama, AU, (some virginia school)
South - A&M, LSU, UGA, UF, Arky, MSU, OM
FIFY
This post was edited on 9/7/11 at 1:13 pm
4
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:13 pm to Jumbeauxlaya
quote:(Some North Carolina School)
(some virginia school)
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:15 pm to Jumbeauxlaya
quote:
North - USCe, UT, UK, Vandy, Bama, AU, (TBD)
South - A&M, LSU, UGA, UF, Arky, MSU, OM
I could live with that
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:15 pm to Jumbeauxlaya
quote:
North - USCe, UT, UK, Vandy, Bama, AU, (some virginia school)
South - A&M, LSU, UGA, UF, Arky, MSU, OM FIFY
That would be a moronic way to division the SEC schools. You just as soon call it "the Bama Football & Hoops Schools Division" vs "The Meathead Football Division"
Bama would win their division in Football 8.8+ times out of 10. The other would beat itself to a pulp for Bama to play them in Atl.
P.S. MSU, UGA, and Old Myth are all north of Aub and Bama.
This post was edited on 9/7/11 at 1:27 pm
Posted on 9/7/11 at 1:25 pm to Jumbeauxlaya
quote:
North - USCe, UT, UK, Vandy, Bama, AU, (some virginia school)
South - A&M, LSU, UGA, UF, Arky, MSU, OM
There are a lot of realignment scenarios that have been thrown out, but this one makes very little sense, particularly the placement of the current westernmost and 2nd northernmost program in the South.
In any East-West division with any rationality behind it, Arkansas will be in the West. In any rational North-South division, it'd be in the North.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News