Started By
Message
re: LOTS of smoke coming from Aggie land that A&M to the SEC is done deal...
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:10 pm to MOT
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:10 pm to MOT
quote:
I don't care one way or the other. But you could just as easily say what would have happened if LSU played Vandy instead of Florida in '06?
Agreed, we could go on and on. When you have the best team in the land, it doesn't matter who you play. That is why I like to play Florida every year. I know, that when LSU gets a chance to play for a title, they will have EARNED it. As a competitor, I don't see how anyone could feel otherwise. As a fan, I can understand people who are only interested in titles.
3
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:14 pm to Tiger in NY
quote:
As a competitor, I don't see how anyone could feel otherwise.
You will get to play them...for a championship if they are as good as you that year.
quote:
As a fan, I can understand people who are only interested in titles.
Yeah because you know...winning games doesn't sell tickets which doesn't give TAF money, who doesn't then give some to LSU. BCS Bowl payout/Tv Revenue/Recruits > Peach Bowl.
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:14 pm to Tiger in NY
The goal is to win championships and to win them in any means necessary within the rules. It doesn't matter how you got there as long as you win.
Posted on 8/9/11 at 12:17 pm to Tiger in NY
Would you rather us not play any small schools(North Texas, Tulane, ULM, etc) and just start to schedule Oregon, Oklahoma, USC, and so on each year so that if in the ungodly event you manage to go undefeated(which you never will) you can be a title team?
Or would you rather actually have a chance to play for a title?
Or would you rather actually have a chance to play for a title?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News