Started By
Message
re: Tide's Richardson has few peers physically
Posted on 5/19/11 at 4:51 pm to NYCAuburn
Posted on 5/19/11 at 4:51 pm to NYCAuburn
quote:
jeez, not saying he has under performed. Just saying two years at under 1k each year, is not all that much. Yes he looks like a stud, but get off his jock till maybe he has hit 1k in yards a year.
Dyer's 1k is great and all but unless he does it again, Meh
Just shy of 900 APY his freshman year. Had 8 TDs including 2 in the NC game.
966 APY and 10 TDs his soph year. This is while missing two games and having 4 others where he was only offered single digit attempts. I mean he had 70 less rushing attempts than Dyer by comparison, yet had a higher YPC despite Dyer having the benefit of teams not loading the box against him nearly as much. And, if you want to add in returns to his APY, he had 1600 yards and 11 TDs.
quote:
Well...
And he had less TDs too. I guess at Auburn more yards is a greater achievement than more points?
This post was edited on 5/19/11 at 4:53 pm
Posted on 5/19/11 at 4:55 pm to secftw
We all know Trent has played well up to now and can get even better. Talk about that all you want. What's annoying is the Bama fans jerking it to how ripped he is
Posted on 5/19/11 at 5:00 pm to secftw
Just saying, all I hear is how trent is better than ingram. Well show me something? yes I know he is the no. 2 back, but has he really proven that he is yet? there is a reason he was no. 2. not saying he is going to be awful, just get off his jock. I have some cousins who are bama grads, all they talked about in 09' was TR.
What are you opinions on McCalebb? He was the no. 3 guy yet has preformed at least, if not better than TR so far.
ETA: Dyer's freshmen year > TR
What are you opinions on McCalebb? He was the no. 3 guy yet has preformed at least, if not better than TR so far.
ETA: Dyer's freshmen year > TR
This post was edited on 5/19/11 at 5:03 pm
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/SR_Icon.jpg)