Started By
Message

re: #1 Recruit in the State of Alabama in '12?

Posted on 2/8/11 at 9:45 pm to
Posted by crimsonsaint
Member since Nov 2009
37280 posts
Posted on 2/8/11 at 9:45 pm to
quote:

I haven't been following recruiting long, but recruits that are considered a 'lock' don't commit to your team's most bitter rival before choosing Bama on NSD


If I was a 5* stud, I would. And on NSD, I'd fax Auburn a picture of my bare arse.

quote:

Will they play for Bama, of course, but they sure as hell wasn't 'locks'


FYI, when you're talking about multiple ppl, use "weren't", not "wasn't".
Posted by CFBFAN1121
Abbottabad, Pakistan
Member since Sep 2006
4174 posts
Posted on 2/8/11 at 10:08 pm to
quote:

FYI, when you're talking about multiple ppl, use "weren't", not "wasn't


Yeah, I noticed my subject verb agreement was a little off after I posted it. Didn't feel the need to go back and correct it.

Still, it doesn't take away from the hilarity of you insuating CK and BC were locks to Bama.

"Locks" wouldn't even let the thought of committing to another school cross their mind, let alone actually commit to the biggest rival on national TV.

"Locks" don't need their family to persuade them to go to a school.

Out your entire recruiting class, BC and CK would be at the last two you would consider "locks".
This post was edited on 2/8/11 at 10:19 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter