Started By
Message

re: The obvious reasons LSU wouldn't deserve Sugar

Posted on 11/15/10 at 10:02 am to
Posted by Draconian Sanctions
Markey's bar
Member since Oct 2008
84944 posts
Posted on 11/15/10 at 10:02 am to
quote:


I'm in the camp that LSU would more than likely get the nod, even though there are ZERO credible reasons for so, due to the obvious tie-ins and connections between the Sugar staff, LSU and local businesses and powers that be.


LSU has a LOT more cache nationally than Arkansas. That would be the deciding factor.
Posted by Slut Hog
Member since May 2010
1092 posts
Posted on 11/15/10 at 10:05 am to
quote:

LSU has a LOT more cache nationally than Arkansas. That would be the deciding factor.


Uh huh. Arkansas has an exciting offense, and LSU has a half-retard who eats grass. Both make for great television. Looks like the Sugar bowl committee is gonna have a tough decision on their hands.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter