Started By
Message
locked post

This may be Auburn's problem!!!

Posted on 11/14/10 at 5:35 am
Posted by StarkvilleTigerFan
Muncie, IN
Member since Jan 2005
3939 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 5:35 am
Again, I'm no Auburn hater and I wish all this never happened. I know everyone has an opinion about how this rule works or what the NCAA has or doesn't have and such. But in the end, even if nothing can be traced cash wise to Auburn or if they knew anything, Newton's eligibility decision should and will be based on the NCAA's mission to insure fairness and limit any actions which may allow schools to gain an unfair advantage. Thats why you have scholarship limits, recruiting rules, and financial monitoring. If these were not in place, schools with practically unlimited funds such as Notre Dame, USC,and Michigan for example can grab all the top players leaving very few for others.
In this case, and this is just my opinion, I think the NCAA may determine that if its indeed true Cecil was shopping Cam around, if he said "its not going to be free this time" , then that is a violation. I know-you're saying "no shite". Well, Auburn-even without knowing benefitted from that violation. If a deal was offered to MSU, if they were told in order for Cam to sign a LOI, it was going to take xx amount to get him and MSU refused,(as they should have)the NCAA may conclude that Cam's advice from his dad to attend Auburn was based on the fact MSU refused to pay and Auburn-even if they did nothing wrong in the recruitment process- benifitted from this.

Now, according to the column written by Andy Staples:

Quote:
_________________________________________________


So far, Auburn has not been implicated in the pay-for-play scheme. But by the letter of the NCAA's law, an athlete is ineligible the moment a rule is broken. Even if Newton didn't know about his father's request, this is the word the NCAA put out Thursday: "The solicitation of cash or benefits by a prospective student-athlete or another individual on his or her behalf is not allowed under NCAA rules," NCAA spokeswoman Stacey Osburn wrote. It is up to the athlete's school to declare him ineligible and apply for reinstatement.
__________________________________________________

As you can see, the NCAA has made it clear this is a violation. I think this is what the NCAA is trying to figure out.
Now you may ask why is the FBI really involved in this case? Its because this could be looked at as a form of extortion which is a federal crime and now anyone involved could be subject to jail time.

The dust hasn't settled in this one yet!!!
Posted by PuntBamaPunt
Member since Nov 2010
10070 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 5:36 am to
o rly?
Posted by rangers911
Member since Jun 2009
5159 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 2:08 pm to
The NCAA has also made players eligible that directly asked for money and grade help. As long as Auburn doesn't directly have talks with Cecil over pay for play it is very doubtful that Newton will be retroactively ruled that way.

The letter of the law says that but there are countless cases where the NCAA ruled for much worse that a player was fine as long as money changed hands. In some cases money did change hands and he was allowed to stay active. It is a strange issue I must admit.

The chance is there but Auburn has worked with several law firms for months on this and both feel strongly Newton is fine. I must admit personally I'm surprised as Rich McGlynn is not a guy that even gets into these types of things if a player is close to the gray area he kicks them out and says no but in this case he dug in.
Posted by peopleschamp
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
6576 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 2:23 pm to
Again if you cannot prove that Cam knew, you got nothing. Even though we all know he is likely guilty. All Cam has to say is my father was not carrying out my wishes in soliciting money for playing. He was not acting on my behalf when he solicited money. He was acting on his own. It's gonna be tough to prove. Maybe if you can find something on Auburn and Cecil then you can get Auburn. I ain't worried about any of this. That's Auburn's problem. LSU has it's own mess. The Mettenberger kid may turn out to be a model citizen, but I would prefer LSU not take that chance. It's too much of a risk when your talking about sexual assault.
Posted by JSU93
Mt. Hope, Alabama
Member since Oct 2009
142 posts
Posted on 11/14/10 at 2:24 pm to
meh
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter