Started By
Message

re: **Cam Newton investigation UPDATED Page 1 - 11/5, 1:30am**

Posted on 11/5/10 at 10:23 pm to
Posted by cweathers
Member since Oct 2010
77 posts
Posted on 11/5/10 at 10:23 pm to
it very well may be nothing.

my point was simply that every person on this board seems to think that AU has to be guilty of paying a player to get in trouble.

while that is true in regard to probation in the future...if CAM took money or anyone associated with him took money prior to playing at AU...he is no longer an amateur and AU will need to vacate all games this year that they won. If I was in the fan base I would not bank on the NCAA not finding anything on this kid or his family.
Posted by BMW7SERIES
The UES right on the Park
Member since Oct 2010
1240 posts
Posted on 11/5/10 at 10:45 pm to
Well the credibility of the story is gone. Rogers/Bond DID NOT speak to each other. And Rogers has denied any school/booster/alum etc offering money. So there's no credibility.

And I do get what you are trying to suggest, that Rogers is an agent. Well, he has no pro clients and his job functions more of a PR thing to make coaches aware of his clients talents. Basically what that means is that players/parents/HS coaches etc, would pay Rogers to get their player more publicity in the recruiting process. The NCAA has no problem with these services hence, there is no smoke no beef to this story.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter