Started By
Message
locked post

Bama Fans

Posted on 4/16/10 at 3:37 pm
Posted by ZATGRFAN
Zachary, LA
Member since Dec 2007
407 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 3:37 pm
LINK

This is a post on the Rant. I am a Saban Fan, Intrested to see your thoughts
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 3:38 pm to
This is all you need to know:

In five years at LSU, Nick Saban had 2 SEC titles, a national title, and won 75% of his games.

Les Miles, in five years, has 1 SEC title, 1 National title, and has won 77% of his games. So he's won 2% more games, but one less SEC title.

Consider further that Saban took over an LSU program that had 8 losing seasons in the previous 11 years, while Miles took over a program that had 2 SEC titles and a national title in the previous 5 years.

Posted by tuck
Member since Oct 2007
12653 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 3:41 pm to
No brainer really. It's clear liquid rabbit just doesn't want to admit the obvious.
Posted by RlTde2
Pace Florida
Member since Nov 2008
4664 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 3:43 pm to
As I keep Saying..You expect More from LSU..But You Get LES.

Les needs to upgrade his Hat, I don't know what's your take.??
Posted by BamaInHsv
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2008
17889 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 3:44 pm to
I don't see you in that thread.
Posted by FightinTiga
Pumpkin Center
Member since Feb 2009
20745 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 3:46 pm to
No,LSU needs to upgrade its head.
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 3:49 pm to
what was your intention in bringing this to the SEC rant?
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 3:53 pm to
quote:

In five years at LSU, Nick Saban had 2 SEC titles, a national title, and won 75% of his games.

Les Miles, in five years, has 1 SEC title, 1 National title, and has won 77% of his games. So he's won 2% more games, but one less SEC title.

Consider further that Saban took over an LSU program that had 8 losing seasons in the previous 11 years, while Miles took over a program that had 2 SEC titles and a national title in the previous 5 years.



I'm quoting myself here but I don't care. You also have to remember that he took over an Alabama program that had 3 losing years in the previous 6, and won an SEC and national title, as well as won 80% of his games. In total, in 8 years in the SEC, Saban has won 78.6% of his games, 3 SEC titles and 2 NAtional titles. He has done this after taking over TWO teams with NUMEROUS losing seasons in the years preceding his arrival. Does anyone really think Les Miles's numbers with correspond with Saban's after three more years at LSU?
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 3:59 pm to
quote:

an LSU program that had 8 losing seasons in the previous 11 years


It isn't necessary to go back 11 years unless you're just aiming to make Saban look better. Dinardo, his immediate predecessor, had more of an impact than anything before him. In his five year tenure at LSU, he had three winning seasons, including two SEC West titles. And it's not like Dinardo left a bare cupboard, there were very good players on Saban's early teams.

This is no bash on Saban whatsoever, I liked him when he was at LSU and I hold nothing against him, and have no reason to. He's a great coach that made the best decisions for himself. But there's no reason to try and inflate what he did in an effort to criticize Miles.
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 4:05 pm to
quote:

It isn't necessary to go back 11 years unless you're just aiming to make Saban look better. Dinardo, his immediate predecessor, had more of an impact than anything before him. In his five year tenure at LSU, he had three winning seasons, including two SEC West titles. And it's not like Dinardo left a bare cupboard, there were very good players on Saban's early teams.


Really? Thats why Dinardo won so much his last 2 years he was there. Let's put it like this: In the two years before Saban got to LSU LSU had won 5 TOTAL ball games, and had NEVER been to Atlanta (don't give me that two western titles crap- that shite's for Ole Miss). Oh but Dinardo recruited some great players! (yeah and he recruited some shitty ones as well and didn't develope too many either). Do you think, after three more years, Les Miles's accomplishemnts will look anything like what Saban has done, especially given the fact that Saban took over two Losing programs (yes, LSU was a LOSING program when he got there)
Posted by NATidefan
Two hours North of Birmingham
Member since Dec 2008
36582 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 4:08 pm to
Miles is on the Hot Seat while Saban is competing for his next SEC and NC title, I think that pretty much sums it up.
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 4:08 pm to
I'm not getting involved in a Miles vs. Saban debate, I'm only referring to your efforts to include losing seasons in the early 90's when talking about Saban taking over at LSU.
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 4:10 pm to
quote:

I'm not getting involved in a Miles vs. Saban debate, I'm only referring to your efforts to include losing seasons in the early 90's when talking about Saban taking over at LSU.


You don't think the fact that kids growing up watching LSU play losing ball, as well as expectations of the ballplayers who signed, creating a culture of losing for YEARS had any effect?
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 4:12 pm to
Two losing seasons before he got there, but they also played in the SEC championship for two years prior to that.

You need to understand that I'm not bashing Saban. I'm just saying that he's a very good coach and his accomplishments speak for him, they don't need to be fluffed up.
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 4:16 pm to
quote:

they also played in the SEC championship for two years prior to that
.

No. They did not. The SECCG matchups have been as follows:

92: Alabama Florida
93: Alabam Florida
94: Alabama Florida
95: Arkansas Florida
96: Alabama Florida
97: Auburn Tennessee
98: Mississippi State Tennessee
99: Alabama Florida
00: Auburn florida
01: LSU Tennessee

Notice Anything? Thats right! LSU DID NOT play in Atlanta until Saban arrived! Don't rewrite history.
This post was edited on 4/16/10 at 6:48 pm
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 4:20 pm to
That's what I get for relying on wikipedia
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 4:23 pm to
quote:

That's what I get for relying on wikipedia


I love wikipedia when I'm trying to figure out who played in what movie- other than that its useless. BTW, the blue in Dinardo's boxes on wikipedia just means they 'shared' a division title, the same way David Cutcliffe 'shared' one in 2003 and the same way Tuberville 'shared' one 2001, 2002, and 2005 (all years when he did not see Atlanta)
This post was edited on 4/16/10 at 4:25 pm
Posted by Rickety Cricket
Premium Member
Member since Aug 2007
46883 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 4:43 pm to
Yeah that's what threw me off. Thanks for knocking out the base of my argument.

Shared titles are so stupid and pointless, unless you're in Atlanta, you shouldn't be able to claim any share of the West or East.
Posted by labamafan
Prairieville
Member since Jan 2007
25725 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 4:48 pm to
quote:

92: Alabama Florida
93: Alabam Florida
94: Alabama Florida
95: Arkansas Florida
96: Alabama Florida
97: Auburn Tennessee
98: Mississippi State Tennessee
99: Alabama Florida
00: Auburn florida
01: LSU Florida


that is impressive so where does the irrelevant for 25 yrs comments come from?(not in this thread but has been used as an insult before)
Posted by secfan123
beverly hills
Member since Jan 2010
9646 posts
Posted on 4/16/10 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

Shared titles are so stupid and pointless, unless you're in Atlanta, you shouldn't be able to claim any share of the West or East.


I agree. Shared titles are for Ole Miss fans to crow about.
Page 1 2
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on X and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter