Started By
Message
OK LSU fans the non int by Peterson and the rule book
Posted on 11/8/09 at 2:47 pm
Posted on 11/8/09 at 2:47 pm
Julio Touched the ball before Peterson had full possession of the ball and by Jones being out of bounds that makes it to where the ball is dead and Peterson could not get the INT. Doesn't seem fair but that is the rule.
"Ball Out of Bounds
ARTICLE 3. a. A ball not in player possession, other than a kick that scores a field goal, is out of bounds when it touches the ground, a player, a game official or anything else that is on or outside a boundary line."
Thoughts?
"Ball Out of Bounds
ARTICLE 3. a. A ball not in player possession, other than a kick that scores a field goal, is out of bounds when it touches the ground, a player, a game official or anything else that is on or outside a boundary line."
Thoughts?
6
Posted on 11/8/09 at 2:53 pm to spacewrangler
well, in that case, awesome, cuz peterson touches the ball first while in bounds, making it an "in-bounds" play according to your rule. he then ALMOST gets three feet in, but decides to moderately get 2. Was everyone watching the same game? who is the backfield judge? missed the head leading sack, and obvious holding throughout the game.
oh....hear you go.
LINK
oh....hear you go.
LINK
Posted on 11/8/09 at 2:55 pm to spacewrangler
I'm sure that's why the refs called it the way they did....
ETA: I'm not into conspiracy theories. I just think it was a bad call, that the booth guys don't like to overrule the onfield officials, and that if it had been called a pick on the field that it would have stood that way too.
ETA: I'm not into conspiracy theories. I just think it was a bad call, that the booth guys don't like to overrule the onfield officials, and that if it had been called a pick on the field that it would have stood that way too.
This post was edited on 11/8/09 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 11/8/09 at 2:57 pm to geojeff
It sounds like the game is OVER if the call would have been reversed. You still had to score with Jarrett Lee and the rest of the scrubbs. 
Posted on 11/8/09 at 2:58 pm to spacewrangler
You worked hard for this one, but we both know this is a crock.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 2:59 pm to CTexTiger
You Gumps sure are defensive.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 3:01 pm to spacewrangler
I'm not sure who wins the game if teh call goes the other way, but you've got to admit it was a BAD call. 
Posted on 11/8/09 at 3:02 pm to 14caratgoldjones
quote:
You still had to score with Jarrett Lee and the rest of the scrubbs.
Not saying we would have scored after the pick, but didn't those same "scrubs" score the touchdown that put us ahead 15-10?
Posted on 11/8/09 at 3:03 pm to CTexTiger
I just dont see how it was that bad of a call. You cant really tell(inconclusively) that his foot was in bounds from the best camera angle available. Also, it does look lke Julio touches it first while he is out of bounds. Bottom line is that it was too close, and not conclusive enough to overturn. You can say that we stole the game, or whatever, but we won, and thats just the way it is.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 3:05 pm to spacewrangler
way to try to twist the rule - that's not what the rule means jackass
Posted on 11/8/09 at 3:06 pm to Louie T
quote:
way to try to twist the rule - that's not what the rule means jackass
Honestly, if you're going to be like that, why don't you explain what the rule means?
Posted on 11/8/09 at 3:08 pm to CTexTiger
didn't work hard at all for that... it's a logical explanation on why he could've been in bounds and it still could not be called an INT. By Jones touching the ball while not in the playing field the ball it renders the play out of bounds and the play is over. Not trying to flame but this could be the reason for the call.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 3:11 pm to As RXd
quote:the rule is meant to where the guy can't be touching the ball while simultaneously being out of bounds. the rule isn't an incomplete pass if the guy touches the ball in bounds and then runs out of bounds while the ball is in the air while not touching the ball
Honestly, if you're going to be like that, why don't you explain what the rule means?
Posted on 11/8/09 at 3:12 pm to Louie T
no need to flame and yes it is what the rule means. Jones could have tiped the ball back in play to one of our players and if that player caught it and scored a TD. what would your reaction been then? the ball is dead when Jones touched it while he was out of bounds and Peterson did not have possession at that point. No need to be rude. I'm just trying to give a legitimate reason for the call.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 3:13 pm to Funky Tide 8
You'd be pissed if it had happened to your team, I bet.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 3:13 pm to Funky Tide 8
quote:
Funky Tide 8
please
Posted on 11/8/09 at 3:14 pm to spacewrangler
quote:i never flamed you imbecile
no need to flame
quote:that's a legit play if he tipped it back in while still in the field of play. of course you can't be standing on the ground and throw the ball back into play. you can however leap from the field of play and throw the ball back in
Jones could have tiped the ball back in play to one of our players and if that player caught it and scored a TD. what would your reaction been then?
Posted on 11/8/09 at 3:17 pm to pnut53088
quote:
pnut53088
Because I am rationally debating the situation? GTFO loser.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 3:17 pm to Louie T
you did when you called me a jackass and once again with the imbecile comment.
But Jones was OUT OF BOUNDS when he touched the ball and peterson did not have controll of the ball. than means the ball is dead/out of bounds and the play is over. that is how I interpret the rules. the replay clearly shows Jones touching the ball while he was out of bounds.
But Jones was OUT OF BOUNDS when he touched the ball and peterson did not have controll of the ball. than means the ball is dead/out of bounds and the play is over. that is how I interpret the rules. the replay clearly shows Jones touching the ball while he was out of bounds.
Posted on 11/8/09 at 3:19 pm to spacewrangler
patrick peterson clearly touches the ball in bounds before jones touches the ball, that rule isent valid in this situation even if its wrong or right.
Page 1 of 2
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News