re: NCAA accidentally posted ruling an hour ago

I don't really think they should have gotten anything more severe. However, it is curious that the 4 highest amounts for impermissable textbooks were for football players. In addition, the committee noted that the school was unable to provide records prior to 2005 so the case was based on action since that time. Do we just assume that this all started in 2005? It may have been going on during the prior infractions, and just not caught at the time. If I was on the NCAA committee, I would have a real problem with UA not providing the records, especially since they were on probation during that time period. It seems that the NCAA is letting schools get away with improper conduct as long as they don't keep a record of their actions.