Started By
Message

re: SEC vs. PAC (Wack) 10

Posted on 4/24/09 at 1:23 pm to
Posted by junior
baton rouge
Member since Mar 2005
2260 posts
Posted on 4/24/09 at 1:23 pm to
post deleted
This post was edited on 4/25/09 at 9:51 am
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 4/24/09 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

Link please. If true, I'll delete my post and resume reasonable discussion.


Departing boss of women's professional tennis tour says he's willing to consider a college football playoff, among other potential changes.

Q: So you are willing to discuss the possibility of a playoff and willing to look at potential changes?

A: Yes, in the sense that I've been brought in to come with a new and fresh perspective in everything. There's been no issue that I've been told, 'This one you can't touch,' or, 'This isn't up for discussion.' . . . I don't want my answer to be interpreted as signaling there will be a change or won't be a change to the Pac-10's position on this. But I think it's fair to say that the reason someone like myself has been chosen is that people want a fresh look at all these things.

LINK

LINK

Delete.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter