Started By
Message

re: SEC vs. PAC (Wack) 10

Posted on 4/24/09 at 1:15 pm to
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge LA
Member since Sep 2006
36113 posts
Posted on 4/24/09 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

The PAC 10 and the Big 10 refuse to allow a +1 or a playoff. The SEC and the ACC are willing.


Is that why the SEC, at it's 2008 spring meetings, unanimously voted to keep the curent system (BCS)? Is that why the new PAC-10 commish just said he is open to playoffs?
Posted by junior
baton rouge
Member since Mar 2005
2262 posts
Posted on 4/24/09 at 1:23 pm to
post deleted
This post was edited on 4/25/09 at 9:51 am
Posted by Adiossuck
South Carolina Fan
Member since Jan 2007
3768 posts
Posted on 4/24/09 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Is that why the SEC, at it's 2008 spring meetings, unanimously voted to keep the curent system (BCS)?



Winners of the past 2 BCS titles.. I doubt they would vote any other way.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter