Is it too late for Alabama to establish some semblance of a running game?

For the Crimson Tide, the consequences of a one-dimensional offense have now been realized courtesy of the Oklahoma Sooners' superior defense. Of course, that revelation has been discussed thoroughly on these pages. My question is whether a running scheme can still be developed in time for the Iron Bowl? An Auburn victory pretty well seals the fate. Bama will not be in the CFP. If the Tide can't win at Auburn, the prospect of advancing past even the first round is tentative at best if DeBoer and Grubb continue to snub the run. Ty Simpson's brilliance in the September-October gauntlet led to a false illusion that the running game is not very important. I have never understood, though, the neglect that DeBoer and Grubb imposed on the run. West Coast, I guess. In the SEC, a powerful run attack is essential. Kirby Smart gave a lesson on that in the dominant fourth quarter with Texas. Might it occur to Grubb to practice this a bit against Eastern Illinois? Daniel Hill has shown great potential, and if the offensive line can get a bit of tutoring, then Bama might have a good chance in the playoffs. As is, the secondary pulls back and effectively defends the pass, and Ty is running for his life with a relentless rush from a stacked offensive line and edge defenders. (Ty does need to work on ball security and needs to be aware of strip sacks). Your thoughts: Is there time?