Started By
Message
Help me understand something
Posted on 11/1/25 at 7:35 am
Posted on 11/1/25 at 7:35 am
We couldn't fire Sam because of the buyout but the money people didn't want to give Sam the resources. So don't spend the money to fire or support.
Now I hear the name has to be exciting enough to generate support but we need to get him at a discount.
Make this make sense?
Now I hear the name has to be exciting enough to generate support but we need to get him at a discount.
Make this make sense?
3
Posted on 11/1/25 at 7:52 am to boogiewoogie1978
Easy.
It is UofA logic.
It is UofA logic.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 12:05 pm to boogiewoogie1978
It’s a UofA culture problem imo
Which is why it’s been said replacing Pittman & Yurachek are just bandaids on a bullet wound. Replacing them appease the peasants temporarily without fixing the real problem.
Which is why it’s been said replacing Pittman & Yurachek are just bandaids on a bullet wound. Replacing them appease the peasants temporarily without fixing the real problem.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.Posted on 11/1/25 at 12:07 pm to boogiewoogie1978
Yurachek wanted to save face and come out looking smart by firing Sam with a reduced buyout. It's really nothing more than that.
As for a great savings coach, it seems like framing for BMFP.
As for a great savings coach, it seems like framing for BMFP.
Posted on 11/1/25 at 3:21 pm to johnzorback
quote:
As for a great savings coach, it seems like framing for BMFP.
I think he fired Sam at the perfect time, to make it look like Bobby had two weeks to go into a murderers row. And that way he can’t say he wasn’t given a chance.
Page 1 of 1
Latest Arkansas News
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News