re: The reason the Aggie/Longhorn series has never had national relevance

Posted on 5/10/24 at 7:29 pm to dstone12

Posted by CGSC Lobotomy

Member since Sep 2011

81362 posts

Posted on 5/10/24 at 7:29 pm to dstone12

quote:
It would also be fun for you to do OU vs Texas and tell us why that rivalry is a big one.

It would be better and "more fun" if I told you to frick off and do it yourself since I don't owe you a fricking thing.

This post was edited on 5/10/24 at 7:32 pm

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by dstone12

Texan

Member since Jan 2007

30734 posts

Posted on 5/10/24 at 7:42 pm to CGSC Lobotomy

quote:
It would be better and "more fun" if I told you to frick off and do it yourself since I don't owe you a fricking thing.

Sounds like our resident dork wants to find ways to answer how no one cares about aggy rivalries.

Dstone12 has to mansplain by suggesting we find the lowest common denominator.

It's aggy. Nationally relevant rivalries usually have TWO significant programs, you dumbass. That's why:

Tx v OU is a rivalry of relevance
Tx v aggy NOT a significant rivalry as you said.
Ou v aggy NOT a significant rivalry
LSU v aggy NOT a significant rivalry.......but you tried

No matter how hard you try on this forum, your program ain't shite, son.