Started By
Message

re: Who will pay for revenue sharing

Posted on 5/2/24 at 1:32 pm to
Posted by bamaoldtimer
Member since Dec 2009
1006 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 1:32 pm to
quote:

Nobody is gonna pay extra to watch college football. It worked for Peacock but it had the NFLs brand and Talir Swift.


I respectfully disagree. I’d venture it probably will be for individual games along with free games. SEC will need to raise more revenue things will get greedy. For us rabid college fans, we’ll pay to watch Texas / OU, Bama/ LSU, Texas / A&M etc. The free games will be like Missouri/ Vandy. Etc . I don’t like it but the asshats that run the sport already don’t give a F—. About us. So why should they hesitate to bleed as much as they can from us?

Texas was a little ahead of its time with the LHN but had the right idea.

Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
23042 posts
Posted on 5/2/24 at 3:03 pm to
quote:


I respectfully disagree. I’d venture it probably will be for individual games along with free games. SEC will need to raise more revenue things will get greedy. For us rabid college fans, we’ll pay to watch Texas / OU, Bama/ LSU, Texas / A&M etc. The free games will be like Missouri/ Vandy. Etc . I don’t like it but the asshats that run the sport already don’t give a F—. About us. So why should they hesitate to bleed as much as they can from us?

Texas was a little ahead of its time with the LHN but had the right idea.


Exactly what are you a rabid fan of? Just the name Alabama?

Could probably market a box of shite to someone like you as long as they put the Alabama logo on it.

Personally, nothing you've described thus far is college football. So I don't see how you can keep saying you are a rabid fan of something that no longer exists, just the team names.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter