Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

re: Honest discussion about NIL. Would love to hear thoughts.

Posted on 4/25/24 at 10:16 am to
Posted by ALhunter
Member since Dec 2018
2956 posts
Posted on 4/25/24 at 10:16 am to
quote:

no revenue to share unless you want to take it away from all the other sports because there are only 1 or 2 sports that draw income
Right... under a revenue sharing construct the university could make up funding shortfalls for the other sports or not - school's choice. Not football's problem if the water polo team needs a new pool.
quote:

the government to butt the frick out of it

Government has just said that the schools can't stop players from taking NIL money... which in a free society makes sense as it's anti-competitive.

Everything else is moot. Schools have a choice at this point to go full pro league with collective bargaining or run with the current status quo. In a full "pro league" there would still be NIL mind you. It's not like pros can't get sponsorships, it just has less of an impact.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter