Started By
Message
re: Can't keep up...which 2-4 teams is the SEC adding?
Posted on 3/21/24 at 2:31 pm to HighTide_ATL
Posted on 3/21/24 at 2:31 pm to HighTide_ATL
Georgia not playing GT sounds good to me. It’s no fun having to go to Techs rusty old hulk of a stadium every other year and having to put up with around 15,000 obnoxious Techies.
Georgia takes over that ridiculous excuse for a stadium and paints it red. GT adds nothing to any conference. Poor fan support, a mountain of debt and stadium that should probably be condemned. For their name to even being uttered as a possibility for the SEC is ridiculous.
Georgia takes over that ridiculous excuse for a stadium and paints it red. GT adds nothing to any conference. Poor fan support, a mountain of debt and stadium that should probably be condemned. For their name to even being uttered as a possibility for the SEC is ridiculous.
1
Posted on 3/21/24 at 2:44 pm to SaturdayNAthens
What people are ignoring, is this:
The Big 10 is hellbent on taking over the CFB landscape, and becoming the governing body for the top tier. In their minds, the term "1-A" or "FCS" should be replaced with "BIG".
They have gutted the Pac 12, their closest ally. They have encircled the Big 12, which was floundering.
The ACC is beginning to crack, and most of the former Big East schools fit the Big 10 profile, if they choose to take them: Syracuse, BC, etc. Pitt is in their footprint.
They could raid the Big 12, getting West Virginia and most of the Midwest/West teams, filling in from Nebraska to USC.
The lone spot they don't have a foothold, is coincidentally the hottest recruiting region- the Southeast. Which is why the SEC is the single best conference.
The question will not be "who do we WANT in the SEC", it will be "who do we NOT want in the Big 10". Because teams will end up in one, or the other.
The Big 10 is hellbent on taking over the CFB landscape, and becoming the governing body for the top tier. In their minds, the term "1-A" or "FCS" should be replaced with "BIG".
They have gutted the Pac 12, their closest ally. They have encircled the Big 12, which was floundering.
The ACC is beginning to crack, and most of the former Big East schools fit the Big 10 profile, if they choose to take them: Syracuse, BC, etc. Pitt is in their footprint.
They could raid the Big 12, getting West Virginia and most of the Midwest/West teams, filling in from Nebraska to USC.
The lone spot they don't have a foothold, is coincidentally the hottest recruiting region- the Southeast. Which is why the SEC is the single best conference.
The question will not be "who do we WANT in the SEC", it will be "who do we NOT want in the Big 10". Because teams will end up in one, or the other.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News