Started By
Message
re: The ONLY reason I have had a live TV package the last few years was for sports. No more.
Posted on 3/5/24 at 10:46 am to WildTchoupitoulas
Posted on 3/5/24 at 10:46 am to WildTchoupitoulas
quote:
I know I'm not paying to watch football games on TV, especially when they still have commercials.
Have you been using an antenna the past 40 years?
Everyone I know has paid for cable/satellite/or a streaming package the past 40 years with commercials.
This "how dare they" mantra seems confusing and revisionist.
1
Posted on 3/5/24 at 11:57 am to meansonny
quote:
Have you been using an antenna the past 40 years?
Closer to 20 years now.
quote:
Everyone I know has paid for cable/satellite/or a streaming package the past 40 years with commercials.
That's why they frick us, because so many people like your friends are willing to just stick their arse up in the air and ask for it. If people balked at getting charged and getting commercials, they wouldn't be able to do it.
quote:What's revisionist is that when they came out with cable in the early 80s, they told us there wouldn't be commercials because there would be a monthly fee instead. After a few years they sprung the commercials on us. They got away with it because too many American consumers are lazy and just went along with it.
This "how dare they" mantra seems confusing and revisionist.
frick ESPN and cable TV.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News