Started By
Message

re: On3 Sports Jesse Simonton

Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:36 pm to
Posted by Smokeyone
Maryville Tn
Member since Jul 2016
16169 posts
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

NCAA rules that violate recruiting are.


What do you feel was the violation?
Posted by robvols
Member since Jan 2024
189 posts
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:45 pm to
Can he list the recruiting violations that Bama was committing but didn't get busted by the NCAA because they were throwing money bags towards their direction?
Posted by NukemVol
Member since Jan 2010
1636 posts
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:46 pm to
In my opinion it doesn't matter if a rule was broken. All NIL rules via NCAA are anti-trust violations as they would naturally prohibit NIL activity. Brett Kavanaugh said as much. Most people see it. You can frame as a Tennessee violation, but if NIL is anywhere in the argument, it's a loser.
Posted by TideWarrior
Asheville/Chapel Hill NC
Member since Sep 2009
11841 posts
Posted on 1/31/24 at 5:10 pm to
The NCAA is not coming after UT because Nico has a NIL deal. The issue stems from boosters allegedly providing impermissible benefits on behalf of UT for a recruit during the recruiting process.

The Alston case in reference does not discuss or even considered if a school could use NIL to recruit it just said the NCAA could not create any rule preventing NIL deals with players and third parties for NIL contracts. The case or the courts have given no indication that universities can violate NCAA recruiting rules including allowing NIL to be used as an enticement.

Again different issues here but the NCAA still has to prove what is being alleged is a violation. I was just pointing out that the Alston has no value as a reference here.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow SECRant for SEC Football News
Follow us on Twitter and Facebook to get the latest updates on SEC Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitter