Started By
Message
re: On3 Sports Jesse Simonton
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:10 pm to Loganville Vols
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:10 pm to Loganville Vols
You realize the Alston case has nothing to do with this correct? That case said the NCAA could not prevent student athletes from getting NIL money. The issue is not the kid received money but NCAA rules that violate recruiting are. No where have I seen the NCAA said Nico could not get NIL money.
Do not confuse the two cases because UT may have gotten caught buying recruits which the judges never mentioned that or ruled on it.
Do not confuse the two cases because UT may have gotten caught buying recruits which the judges never mentioned that or ruled on it.
This post was edited on 1/31/24 at 4:13 pm
3
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:35 pm to TideWarrior
Why would Tennessee buy players with the NIL?? That doesn’t make sense. Plus 6 months ago NCAA said Tennessee had the perfect example of the NIL ran program.
Posted on 1/31/24 at 4:36 pm to TideWarrior
quote:
NCAA rules that violate recruiting are.
What do you feel was the violation?
Posted on 2/1/24 at 12:44 pm to TideWarrior
Thanks for the support! Have you ever considered what might happen if Saban's influence waned and the NCAA seriously came after Bama? I bet DeBoer has.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow SECRant for SEC Football News